Câu hỏi IELTS Speaking chủ đề Phones & Online Messages theo các nhánh nhỏ là Typing, Text messages, Phone Restriction...Cả nhà cùng xem câu hỏi, sample và thêm ý tưởng, từ vựng nhé.

Part 1 – E.P.A.C.T:

Các ý tưởng này sẽ giúp bạn phát triển ý đỡ cụt hơn, nhiều cái để nói hơn:

Example

(Ví dụ)

Popularity

(Độ phổ biến)

Advantage

(Lợi ích)

Cost

(Chi phí)

Time

(Thời gian)

Part 2 – I.S.O:

Khi kể một câu chuyện hay mô tả một sự kiện, hãy tổ chức bài nói theo các yếu tố sau để đảm bảo mạch logic tự nhiên và thu hút người nghe:

Introduction (Giới thiệu)

Story (Câu chuyện)

Opinion (Quan điểm riêng)

Tham khảo thêm một số bài mẫu theo ISO: Tổng hợp bài mẫu Speaking Part 2

Part 3 – A.R.E.C:

Khi thảo luận vấn đề chuyên sâu, hãy phát triển câu trả lời theo các yếu tố sau để để bài nói có chiều sâu và thể hiện tư duy phản biện:

Answer

(Trả lời trực tiếp)

Reason

(Lý do)

Example

(Ví dụ)

Consequence

(Kết quả)

Speaking Part 1 Sample

Chủ đề Typing

1. Do you prefer typing or handwriting?

Sample 1 (Advantage + Example): I’m much more partial to typing for most tasks. The primary advantage is the sheer efficiency and the ability to edit text instantly without making a mess. Specifically, when I’m drafting a long report, typing allows me to organize my thoughts into a streamlined structure much faster than using a pen.

Sample 2 (Popularity + Time): While handwriting has a certain nostalgic charm, typing is all the rage because it’s a vital skill in the modern workforce. I spend a significant amount of time on digital devices, so typing has become my default mode of communication, as it's far more legible than my messy script.

partial to /ˈpɑːʃl tə/ adj phr rất thích, thiên về cái gì đó
streamlined /ˈstriːmlaɪnd/ adj được tối ưu hóa, sắp xếp hợp lý
nostalgic /nɒˈstældʒɪk/ adj hoài niệm, gợi nhớ quá khứ
all the rage /ɔːl ðə reɪdʒ/ idiom đang là mốt, rất phổ biến
legible /ˈledʒəbl/ adj dễ đọc, rõ ràng

2. Do you type on a desktop or laptop keyboard every day?

Sample 1 (Example + Advantage): I primarily use a laptop keyboard because I’m often on the go. For instance, I frequently work from cafes or libraries. The major benefit of a laptop is its portability, allowing me to maintain my productivity levels regardless of my physical location.

Sample 2 (Time + Cost): At home, I spend most of my time on a desktop with a mechanical keyboard. Although high-quality peripheral gear can be quite costly, the tactile feedback and ergonomic design make it a very worthwhile investment for someone who types for hours on end.

portability /ˌpɔːtəˈbɪləti/ n tính di động
tactile feedback /ˈtæktaɪl ˈfiːdbæk/ n phr phản hồi xúc giác, cảm giác khi gõ phím
worthwhile investment /ˌwɜːθˈwaɪl ɪnˈvestmənt/ n phr sự đầu tư xứng đáng

3. When did you learn how to type on a keyboard?

Sample 1 (Example + Popularity): I first learned the basics during primary school in an IT class. Specifically, we used software that turned typing into a game. This was a highly popular way to teach kids back then, and it helped me develop muscle memory from a very young age.

Sample 2 (Time + Advantage): I didn't truly master touch typing until my university years. I realized that hunting for keys was too time-consuming for my assignments. The advantage of finally learning to type without looking at the keys was a massive boost in my academic efficiency.

muscle memory /ˈmʌsl ˈmeməri/ n phr trí nhớ cơ bắp
touch typing /tʌtʃ ˈtaɪpɪŋ/ n phr gõ phím bằng 10 ngón, không nhìn phím
default /dɪˈfɔːlt/ adj mặc định, lựa chọn quen thuộc

4. How do you improve your typing?

Sample 1 (Example + Advantage): I use online platforms like Monkeytype or 10FastFingers to practice. Specifically, I dedicate ten minutes a day to these drills. The primary benefit is that it improves both my accuracy and my "Words Per Minute" (WPM) count in a disciplined manner.

Sample 2 (Popularity + Time): "Gamified" typing apps are increasingly popular for skill building. I try to spend some leisure time competing in typing races online. It’s a fascinating way to sharpen my hand-eye coordination while having a bit of fun at the same time.

accuracy /ˈækjərəsi/ n độ chính xác
disciplined /ˈdɪsəplɪnd/ adj có tính kỷ luật
hand-eye coordination /hænd aɪ kəʊˌɔːdɪˈneɪʃn/ n phr sự phối hợp giữa tay và mắt
words per minute / wpm /wɜːdz pɜː ˈmɪnɪt/ n phr số từ gõ được trong một phút

Text messages

1. How often do you send text messages?

Sample answer: Oh, quite often. I’d say I send messages on a daily basis, mostly through apps like Zalo or Messenger. It’s just the quickest way to stay in touch with my friends and colleagues. I hardly ever make phone calls anymore unless it’s something urgent.

on a daily basis /ɒn ə ˈdeɪli ˈbeɪsɪs/ phrase hằng ngày
stay in touch with /steɪ ɪn tʌtʃ wɪð/ phrase giữ liên lạc với

2. Is sending messages popular in your country?

Sample answer: Definitely yes. I think almost everyone in Vietnam sends messages every day. It’s a really convenient and cost-effective way to communicate. Even older people have learned to use messaging apps because it helps them keep connected with their children who live far away.

cost-effective /ˌkɒst ɪˈfektɪv/ adj tiết kiệm
keep connected with /kiːp kəˈnektɪd wɪð/ phrase duy trì kết nối với

3. Did you send more messages when you were younger?

Sample answer 1: Probably yes. When I was a student, I used to text my friends all day long, mostly about random things or homework. Now that I’m busier, I still text a lot but it’s usually for work-related matters. I guess growing up changes the way we communicate.

Sample answer 2: Not really. When I was younger, I didn’t use my phone that much — I preferred talking face to face with my friends. Nowadays, I actually text more often because everyone’s so busy, and it’s the easiest way to stay connected even when we don’t have time to meet.

text someone all day long /tekst ˈsʌmwʌn ɔːl deɪ lɒŋ/ phrase nhắn tin với ai đó suốt cả ngày
work-related matters /wɜːk rɪˈleɪtɪd ˈmætəz/ phrase các vấn đề liên quan đến công việc
talk face to face /tɔːk feɪs tə feɪs/ phrase nói chuyện trực tiếp
stay connected /steɪ kəˈnektɪd/ phrase giữ liên lạc, kết nối với nhau

4. Do you reply to messages as soon as you receive them?

Sample answer: It depends. If it’s something important, I try to get back to the person right away. But if I’m in the middle of something, I prefer to reply later when I can give a proper answer. I don’t like sending half-hearted responses just for the sake of being quick.

get back to someone /ɡet bæk tə ˈsʌmwʌn/ phrase phản hồi, trả lời ai đó
half-hearted response /ˌhɑːf ˈhɑːtɪd rɪˈspɒns/ phrase câu trả lời hời hợt, không nhiệt tình

Speaking Part 2 Sample

Describe an occasion when you were not allowed to use your mobile phone

  • When it was
  • Where it was
  • Why you were not allowed to use your mobile phone

And how you felt about it

* Outline

Introduction

The occasion: A high-stakes professional certification exam.

Where it was: At a designated international testing center in the city.

Significance: It was a rare moment in my modern life where I had to be completely disconnected from the digital world for several hours.

Story

When it was: About three months ago, during my final assessment for a digital education certificate.

Why you were not allowed: To ensure academic integrity and prevent any form of communication or cheating during the exam. All electronic devices had to be powered off and stored in secure lockers before entering the room.

The situation: I spent nearly four hours in a quiet, monitored environment with nothing but a pen, paper, and my own thoughts.

Opinion

How you felt: Initially, I felt a bit of phantom vibration syndrome, reaching for my pocket out of habit. However, as the exam progressed, I felt a surprising sense of mental clarity.

Conclusion: Although it was stressful due to the exam, being forced to stay off the grid was a refreshing break that helped me focus entirely on the task at hand.

* Sample Answer

In today’s hyper-connected world, it's quite rare to be separated from our devices, but I vividly remember an occasion when I was strictly forbidden from using my mobile phone during a professional certification exam.

It happened about three months ago at a formal testing center. I was there to take a high-stakes exam related to Learning Management Systems (LMS). Because the credentials are recognized globally, the security measures were stringent. Before entering the examination hall, we were instructed to switch off our phones and place them in individual lockers.
Initially, I felt a sense of anxiety, almost like I was missing a limb. I’ve become so accustomed to having information at my fingertips that being "offline" felt quite vulnerable. I even experienced a few moments of phantom vibrations, where I thought I felt my phone buzzing in a pocket that was actually empty.

However, once the exam started, my perspective shifted. Without the constant barrage of notifications and the urge to check emails, I found myself entering a state of "deep work." The absence of my phone acted as a catalyst for intense concentration. I was forced to rely solely on my memory and analytical skills.

Ultimately, while the experience was born out of necessity for compliance, it was incredibly eye-opening. It made me realize how much of a distraction our devices can be. When I finally retrieved my phone after four hours,

I felt a strange sense of liberation, having proven to myself that I could still function perfectly well without being tethered to the digital world.

academic integrity /ˌækəˈdemɪk ɪnˈteɡrəti/ n phr sự liêm chính trong học thuật (không gian lận)
monitored /ˈmɒnɪtəd/ adj được giám sát chặt chẽ
phantom vibration syndrome /ˈfæntəm vaɪˈbreɪʃn ˈsɪndrəʊm/ n phr hội chứng "rung túi quần ảo" (cảm giác điện thoại rung dù không có)
stringent /ˈstrɪndʒənt/ adj nghiêm ngặt, chặt chẽ (về quy định, luật lệ)
accustomed /əˈkʌstəmd/ adj đã quen với điều gì đó
barrage /ˈbærɑːʒ/ n một chuỗi dồn dập (thường dùng cho thông tin hoặc thông báo)
compliance /kəmˈplaɪəns/ n sự tuân thủ (quy định, luật pháp)
eye-opening /ˈaɪ əʊpnɪŋ/ adj mang tính khai sáng, mở mang tầm mắt
liberation /ˌlɪbəˈreɪʃn/ n sự tự do, sự giải phóng (khỏi một áp lực nào đó)

Describe a time when you answered a phone call from someone you didn’t know in a public place

You should say:

  • When and where it happened
  • Who called you
  • What he/she said
  • How you corresponded

And explain how you felt about the experience

* Outline

Introduction

Vào tháng 6 năm nay, khi đi dạo buổi sáng trong vườn bách thảo của trường.

Nhận cuộc gọi từ một người lạ, hóa ra là kẻ lừa đảo.

Story

1. Diễn biến cuộc gọi:

Ban đầu từ chối vì số lạ, nhưng họ gọi liên tục nên mình nghe máy.

Người đó tự xưng là chuyên viên tài khoản, nhưng không biết tên ngân hàng của mình → đáng ngờ.

2. Nội dung cuộc gọi:

Nói rằng thẻ tín dụng bị đánh cắp, có giao dịch gian lận bị chặn.

Yêu cầu đọc mã PIN ngay lập tức để xử lý sự cố.

3. Cách phản ứng:

Nhận ra lời nói mâu thuẫn với chính sách ngân hàng.

Yêu cầu cung cấp thông tin chi nhánh, bộ phận, đề nghị đến trực tiếp cùng cảnh sát.

Kẻ lừa đảo cúp máy ngay, sau đó chặn số mình.

Opinion

Nhẹ nhõm vì không bị lừa.

Vui vì ở nơi công cộng, có không gian thoải mái để nói chuyện lâu.

* Sample Answer

Just earlier this year, in June, while taking my morning walk in the botanical garden on my school’s campus, I answered a phone call from a stranger who turned out to be a scammer.

At first, as it was a call from an unknown number, I declined. But they kept ringing me, so I decided to pick up, thinking that it might be an important matter. The caller introduced himself as an account specialist, and this immediately raised a red flag for me, because had he held such a position, he would have known the name of my bank. Nevertheless, I acknowledged what he said with “Okay” and listened on to see what this was all about.

The self-proclaimed specialist told me he was suspecting that my credit card details might have been stolen, since a number of fraudulent transactions in my name had been suspended. He then demanded me to read my card PIN to him immediately, which he said was the only chance we had to halt these acts, with him entering my account and freeing it.

Unfortunately for him, I was a longtime customer. So I called him out for contradicting the bank’s policy, which was never requiring such confidential information to be shared over the phone. As he was still insistent, I questioned his identity, pressing him to name the specific department and branch he worked for so that I could come with a law-enforcement officer to process my case. He abruptly hung up, and obviously blocked my number, as when I called his, it was unavailable.

Overall, I felt relieved as I was not gullible , not buying into his words. I was so glad that the public garden I was had plenty of open space for me to talk on my phone at length.

scammer /ˈskæmə(r)/ n kẻ lừa đảo
unknown number /ˌʌnˈnəʊn ˈnʌmbə(r)/ n phr số điện thoại lạ
raise a red flag /reɪz ə red flæɡ/ idiom khiến ai đó nghi ngờ, báo hiệu có vấn đề
self-proclaimed /ˌself prəˈkleɪmd/ adj tự xưng
fraudulent transactions /ˈfrɔːdjələnt trænˈzækʃnz/ n phr các giao dịch gian lận
halt these acts /hɔːlt điːz ækts/ phrase ngăn chặn những hành vi này
confidential information /ˌkɒnfɪˈdenʃl ˌɪnfəˈmeɪʃn/ n phr thông tin bảo mật
law-enforcement officer /lɔː ɪnˈfɔːsmənt ˈɒfɪsə(r)/ n phr nhân viên/cán bộ thực thi pháp luật
gullible /ˈɡʌləbl/ adj dễ tin người, nhẹ dạ cả tin
buy into his words /baɪ ˈɪntə hɪz wɜːdz/ phrase tin vào lời nói của anh ta

Speaking Part 3 Sample

Phone Restriction

1. How does the internet benefit people?

  • Answer: The internet serves as a catalyst for global connectivity and information accessibility.
  • Reason: It has effectively "democratized" knowledge, allowing anyone with a connection to learn virtually anything.
  • Example: A student in a remote area can access world-class lectures from Ivy League universities via platforms like Coursera.
  • Consequence: As a result, the internet has leveled the playing field, fostering equal opportunities for education and economic growth.

Sample Answer: In my view, the internet acts as a powerful catalyst for global connectivity and unparalleled information accessibility. It has effectively 'democratized' knowledge, breaking down the geographical and financial barriers that once restricted high-quality education. For instance, a student residing in a remote village can now access the same world-class academic resources from prestigious universities as someone living in a major city. Consequently, the internet has significantly leveled the playing field, fostering equal opportunities for personal and professional advancement on a global scale."

catalyst /ˈkætəlɪst/ n chất xúc tác
democratized knowledge /dɪˈmɒkrətaɪzd ˈnɒlɪdʒ/ n phr bình đẳng hóa tri thức (làm cho kiến thức tiếp cận được với mọi người)
level the playing field /ˈlevl ðə ˈpleɪɪŋ fiːld/ idiom tạo ra một sân chơi bình đẳng

2. What are examples of good and poor phone manners?

  • Answer: Good manners involve mindful usage, while poor manners often stem from digital obsession.
  • Reason: Respecting the physical presence of others is the cornerstone of social etiquette.
  • Example: A good habit is silencing your phone during a meeting; a poor habit is 'phubbing'—ignoring a friend to scroll through social media.
  • Consequence: Practicing proper etiquette ensures that digital tools enhance, rather than diminish, our interpersonal relationships.

Sample Answer: Proper phone etiquette is rooted in mindful usage, whereas poor manners usually stem from a lack of self-awareness in social settings. The cornerstone of modern etiquette is ensuring that your device does not intrude upon the physical presence of others. For example, keeping one's phone out of sight during a dinner conversation is a mark of respect, while 'phubbing'—the act of snubbing someone in favor of a smartphone—is considered highly offensive. Ultimately, maintaining these boundaries ensures that technology serves as a tool for connection rather than a barrier to interpersonal intimacy.

mindful usage /ˈmaɪndfl ˈjuːsɪdʒ/ n phr sử dụng một cách có ý thức/tỉnh táo
phubbing /ˈfʌbɪŋ/ n hành động phớt lờ người đối diện để dùng điện thoại
interpersonal intimacy /ˌɪntəˈpɜːsnl ˈɪntɪməsi/ n phr sự thân mật/gần gũi giữa người với người

3. Do you think it is necessary to have laws on the use of mobile phones?

  • Answer: Yes, legislation is vital when phone usage poses a threat to public safety.
  • Reason: Human attention is a finite resource, and distractions in high-risk situations can be fatal.
  • Example: Strict laws against texting while driving have been implemented globally to reduce road accidents.
  • Consequence: Such regulations provide a legal framework that enforces responsible behavior and protects lives.

Sample Answer: I believe that legislation is absolutely vital, particularly in contexts where mobile phone usage poses a direct threat to public safety. Since human attention is a finite resource, being distracted in high-risk environments can lead to catastrophic outcomes. A prime example of this is the implementation of stringent laws against 'distracted driving' in most developed nations. By establishing a clear legal framework and imposing penalties, governments can enforce responsible behavior and significantly mitigate the risk of avoidable fatalities."

direct threat /dəˈrekt θret/ n phr mối đe dọa trực tiếp
stringent laws /ˈstrɪndʒənt lɔːz/ n phr luật pháp nghiêm khắc
mitigate /ˈmɪtɪɡeɪt/ v giảm thiểu (hậu quả/rủi ro)

4. Is it a waste of time to take pictures with mobile phones?

  • Answer: Not necessarily, as photography is a way to preserve fleeting moments.
  • Reason: Visual records allow us to revisit experiences and share perspectives that words cannot describe.
  • Example: Taking a photo of a family reunion captures an emotion and a setting that fades from memory over time.
  • Consequence: However, one must strike a balance to ensure they don't experience life only through a lens, missing the authentic experience.

Sample Answer: I don't believe taking photos is a waste of time; rather, it is a modern means of preserving fleeting moments and personal history. These visual records allow us to revisit cherished experiences and share unique perspectives with others long after the event has passed. For instance, a snapshot of a rare family gathering captures an emotional essence that human memory might eventually lose. That said, it is crucial to strike a balance to ensure that the act of documenting doesn't overshadow the authentic experience itself.

preserving fleeting moments /prɪˈzɜːvɪŋ ˈfliːtɪŋ ˈməʊmənts/ phrase lưu giữ những khoảnh khắc vụt qua
emotional essence /ɪˈməʊʃənl ˈesns/ n phr cốt lõi/bản chất của cảm xúc
authentic experience /ɔːˈθentɪk ɪkˈspɪəriəns/ n phr trải nghiệm chân thực

5. What positive and negative impact do mobile phones have on friendship?

  • Answer: They facilitate instant communication but can also lead to superficial connections.
  • Reason: While they bridge long distances, they often encourage "digital multitasking" during face-to-face interactions.
  • Example: Friends can stay in touch daily across time zones, but may feel disconnected when one person is constantly checking notifications during lunch.
  • Consequence: Therefore, phones can either strengthen or erode the depth of a friendship depending on how they are used.

Sample Answer: Mobile phones are a double-edged sword; they facilitate instantaneous communication but can also inadvertently lead to superficiality in friendships. On the positive side, they allow friends to bridge vast distances and maintain a presence in each other's lives through constant messaging. Conversely, the temptation of 'digital multitasking' can erode the quality of face-to-face interactions. For example, if a person is constantly distracted by notifications during a meetup, it can make their friend feel undervalued. Thus, technology can either bolster or weaken the emotional bond depending on the user's discipline."

instantaneous communication /ˌɪnstənˈteɪniəs kəˌmjuːnɪˈkeɪʃn/ n phr giao tiếp tức thời
inadvertently /ˌɪnədˈvɜːtəntli/ adv vô tình/không cố ý
erode /ɪˈrəʊd/ v bào mòn (nghĩa bóng: làm yếu đi)

6. How do young and old people use mobile phones differently?

  • Answer: The difference lies in digital fluency and the primary purpose of usage.
  • Reason: Younger generations use phones as a multifaceted lifestyle tool, whereas older people often view them as a functional communication device.
  • Example: A teenager might use a phone for content creation and gaming, while a senior might primarily use it for voice calls or reading news.
  • Consequence: This creates a digital divide where the two generations perceive the value of technology in fundamentally different ways.

Sample Answer: The disparity between how different generations utilize mobile technology primarily comes down to their level of digital fluency. For the youth, a smartphone is a multifaceted lifestyle hub used for everything from content creation to social networking and entertainment. In stark contrast, older generations often perceive the device through a more functional lens, prioritizing voice calls or basic information gathering. For instance, while a teenager might be proficient in editing viral videos, a senior might only use the phone to stay in touch with family. This creates a notable digital divide in how technology is integrated into daily life.

digital fluency /ˈdɪdʒɪtl ˈfluːənsi/ n phr sự thành thạo công nghệ số
multifaceted lifestyle hub /ˌmʌltiˈfæsɪtɪd ˈlaɪfstaɪl hʌb/ n phr trung tâm phong cách sống đa năng
digital divide /ˈdɪdʒɪtl dɪˈvaɪd/ n phr khoảng cách công nghệ/kỹ thuật số

Talking in public places

1. Should people be banned from talking loudly in public places?

  • A (Answer): No, banning loud talking isn’t always necessary.
  • R (Reason): Sometimes, it can be beneficial.
  • E (Example): Sports fans cheering boosts players' morale.
  • C (Consequence): In open spaces, loud talking may not disturb anyone.

I believe it’s not a good idea to always ban people from talking loudly in public places. The reason is that the talk can actually sometimes be beneficial, like sports fans cheering, whistling and screaming out names of favorite players, which counts as talking to them and makes them feel fired up because it’s stirring. Another situation is when people are so spread out that their loud talking is inaudible, not bothering each other a bit, like my story in part 2.

ban /bæn/ v cấm
beneficial /ˌbenɪˈfɪʃl/ adj có lợi
boost players' morale /buːst ˈpleɪəz məˈrɑːl/ phrase nâng cao tinh thần của người chơi
feel fired up /fiːl faɪəd ʌp/ phrase cảm thấy phấn khích, có động lực
inaudible /ɪnˈɔːdəbl/ adj không thể nghe thấy, nghe không rõ

2. Should parents teach their children to behave well in public?

  • A (Answer): Yes, parents should teach good behavior.
  • R (Reason): It shapes children’s manners and social interactions.
  • E (Example): Respecting others leads to mutual respect.
  • C (Consequence): Helps build a civilized society and responsible citizens.

Definitely. It is because parenting can shape children’s behaviors. Specifically, by explaining that behaving appropriately in public makes others feel respected, who would in turn treat one accordingly, parents can persuade children to want to be on their best behavior. Also, parents may want to take on the role of educating well-behaved children as this contributes to a civilized society, making them feel proud of themselves as a responsible member, especially during the childhood of their sons or daughters, who are still under their duty of care.

shape children's behaviors /ʃeɪp ˈtʃɪldrənz bɪˈheɪvjəz/ phrase định hình hành vi của trẻ
behave appropriately /bɪˈheɪv əˈprəʊpriətli/ phrase cư xử đúng mực
be on their best behavior /bi ɒn ðeə best bɪˈheɪvjə(r)/ idiom cư xử tốt nhất có thể
civilized society /ˈsɪvəlaɪzd səˈsaɪəti/ n phr xã hội văn minh
duty of care /ˈdjuːti əv keə(r)/ n phr trách nhiệm chăm sóc

3. Why do some people not care about their actions in public?

  • A (Answer): Because they are selfish or unaware.
  • R (Reason): Some prioritize themselves over others.
  • E (Example): Ignoring manners, like littering or cutting lines.
  • C (Consequence): Can annoy others, but some deserve leniency.

I would argue that it is due to their selfish nature. These people might try to justify their indifference by saying that they do not want to be a people pleaser, but those behaving in public with total disregard of others’ feelings are just pure self-centered and obnoxious, for the fact that they can be considerate without compromising their authenticity, like cleaning up after themselves or not cutting lines. Admittedly, there are times when people fail to do these out of ignorance, say when they are preoccupied with work or study. If this is the case, I think they should be cut some slack.

selfish nature /ˈselfɪʃ ˈneɪtʃə(r)/ n phr bản chất ích kỷ
justify their indifference /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪ ðeə ɪnˈdɪfrəns/ phrase biện minh cho sự thờ ơ của mình
total disregard of others' feelings /ˈtəʊtl ˌrɪsprɪˈɡɑːd əv ˈʌðəz ˈfiːlɪŋz/ phrase hoàn toàn không quan tâm đến cảm xúc của người khác
self-centered and obnoxious /ˌself ˈsentəd ənd əbˈnɒkʃəs/ adj phr ích kỷ và khó chịu
cut someone some slack /kʌt ˈsʌmwʌn səm slæk/ idiom thông cảm, bỏ qua cho ai đó một chút

Trên đây là các câu hỏi và câu trả lời, hướng triển khai, từ vựng về Phones & Online Messages , cả nhà thử sức nhé.

Tham khảo thêm:

IELTS Speaking chủ đề Daily Life, Habits, Routines: Câu hỏi và câu trả lời Part 1,2,3