IELTS Writing Task 2 - Bộ bài mẫu Discussion Essay hay

Discuss both views, Discussion Essay là dạng bài thường gặp của IELTS Writing Task 2. Đề thi dạng này được ra theo nhiều chủ đề và có các cụm từ, cấu trúc hữu ích mà bạn có thể tham khảo theo list bài mẫu dược đây.

Trước khi tìm hiểu bài mẫu, chúng ta nhắc lại vê cấu trúc bài viết chung nhé. 

Cấu trúc bài viết Discussion

Cũng giống như các bài Task 2, cấu trúc chung của bài Discussion Essay cũng bao gồm 3 phần chính: 

Mở bài Introduction: Phần này sẽ khoảng 2-3 câu, giới thiệu và trả lời câu hỏi, sử dụng paraphrasing

Thân bài Body Paragraphs: Thường sẽ chia 2 phần bodys để giải đáp về hai góc nhìn (view) theo lập luận, dẫn chứng, phân tích. Kết cấu thường là topic sentence + supporting sentences. Thường chia theo with opinion hoặc without opinion.

Kết bài Conclusion: Tóm tắt lại nội dung, quan điểm, tổng kết.

Khi viết bài, bạn cần phân tích đề bài, lập dàn ý sau đó viết bài và kiểm tra bài viết cẩn thận nhé. 

Với dạng bài này, IELTS Fighter có hướng dẫn chi tiết cách làm bài ở bài trước Hướng dẫn cách viết Writing Task 2 dạng bài Discussion Essay, nếu bạn chưa xem có thể cùng xem lại nha.

Ở bài viết này, chúng ta cùng chữa một số đề với giáo viên 8.0 Writing nhà mình, có video cụ thể bên dưới, cả nhà tham khảo nha.

Bài mẫu Discussion Essay

Sample 1

Chủ đề Health: Some people think that public health can be improved by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others believe this would have little effect and suggest other measures. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

* Outline 

Introduction	Introduce both views and state my opinion. Giới thiệu hai quan điểm và nêu quan điểm cá nhân.
Body 1	Argument for increasing sports facilities: accessibility, encouragement, long-term health benefits. Lợi ích của việc tăng cơ sở thể thao: dễ tiếp cận, khuyến khích tập luyện, lợi ích lâu dài cho sức khỏe.
Body 2	Argument against: lack of motivation, necessity of education and awareness, role of diet. Hạn chế của việc này: thiếu động lực, cần giáo dục và nâng cao nhận thức, vai trò của chế độ ăn uống.
Conclusion	A combination of sports facilities and education is the best approach. Kết hợp cơ sở thể thao và giáo dục là cách tiếp cận tối ưu.

* Sample Essay

Improving public health is a crucial issue, and while some argue that increasing the number of sports facilities is the best solution, others believe that alternative measures are more effective. In my opinion, although sports facilities can play a role in encouraging physical activity, they should be complemented by education and public awareness campaigns to achieve significant improvements in public health.

On the one hand, from my own perspective, providing more sports facilities could encourage people to engage in regular physical exercise, which is a key component of a healthy lifestyle. Having accessible gyms, swimming pools, and parks makes it easier for individuals to engage in various forms of physical activity. Additionally, an increase in such facilities could promote a culture of fitness, motivating more people to adopt an active lifestyle. In the long run, this could help reduce the prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases such as obesity, heart disease, and diabetes.

On the other hand, simply increasing the number of sports facilities may not be sufficient, as many people lack the motivation or knowledge to use them effectively. Without proper education on the benefits of regular exercise, individuals may not take advantage of these facilities. Moreover, public health is influenced by various other factors, such as diet and lifestyle choices. Raising awareness about nutrition, stress management, and the dangers of a sedentary lifestyle is equally important. Governments should implement campaigns to educate people on how to maintain a balanced and healthy lifestyle rather than relying solely on sports infrastructure.

In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that while increasing the number of sports facilities can contribute to better public health, it is not a standalone solution. A more comprehensive approach that includes education and awareness campaigns is essential to ensuring long-term health improvements.

Cải thiện sức khỏe cộng đồng là một vấn đề quan trọng, và trong khi một số người cho rằng tăng số lượng cơ sở thể thao là giải pháp tốt nhất, những người khác lại tin rằng có những biện pháp thay thế hiệu quả hơn. Theo quan điểm của tôi, mặc dù các cơ sở thể thao có thể đóng vai trò trong việc khuyến khích hoạt động thể chất, nhưng chúng cần được bổ sung bằng giáo dục và các chiến dịch nâng cao nhận thức để đạt được những cải thiện đáng kể về sức khỏe cộng đồng.

Một mặt, việc cung cấp thêm cơ sở thể thao có thể khuyến khích mọi người tham gia tập thể dục thường xuyên, một yếu tố quan trọng của lối sống lành mạnh. Việc có các phòng tập, hồ bơi và công viên dễ tiếp cận giúp cá nhân dễ dàng tham gia vào các hoạt động thể chất khác nhau. Hơn nữa, sự gia tăng của các cơ sở này có thể thúc đẩy văn hóa rèn luyện sức khỏe, khuyến khích nhiều người hơn áp dụng lối sống năng động. Về lâu dài, điều này có thể giúp giảm tỷ lệ mắc các bệnh liên quan đến lối sống như béo phì, bệnh tim và tiểu đường.

Mặt khác, chỉ đơn giản tăng số lượng cơ sở thể thao có thể không đủ, vì nhiều người thiếu động lực hoặc kiến thức để sử dụng chúng một cách hiệu quả. Nếu không có sự giáo dục đúng đắn về lợi ích của việc tập thể dục thường xuyên, cá nhân có thể không tận dụng được những cơ sở này. Hơn nữa, sức khỏe cộng đồng bị ảnh hưởng bởi nhiều yếu tố khác, chẳng hạn như chế độ ăn uống và lựa chọn lối sống. Nâng cao nhận thức về dinh dưỡng, quản lý căng thẳng và những nguy cơ của lối sống ít vận động cũng quan trọng không kém. Chính phủ nên thực hiện các chiến dịch giáo dục để hướng dẫn mọi người duy trì một lối sống cân bằng và lành mạnh thay vì chỉ tập trung vào cơ sở thể thao.

Tóm lại, mặc dù việc tăng số lượng cơ sở thể thao có thể góp phần cải thiện sức khỏe cộng đồng, nhưng đây không phải là giải pháp duy nhất. Một cách tiếp cận toàn diện hơn, bao gồm giáo dục và các chiến dịch nâng cao nhận thức, là điều cần thiết để đảm bảo những cải thiện lâu dài về sức khỏe.

* Uncommon Words & Collocations

public awareness campaigns	/ˈpʌblɪk əˈweənəs kæmˈpeɪnz/	n phr	các chiến dịch nâng cao nhận thức cộng đồng
culture of fitness	/ˈkʌltʃər əv ˈfɪtnəs/	n phr	văn hóa rèn luyện thể chất
lifestyle-related diseases	/ˈlaɪfstaɪl rɪˈleɪtɪd dɪˈziːzɪz/	n phr	các bệnh liên quan đến lối sống
sedentary lifestyle	/ˈsɛdənˌteri ˈlaɪfstaɪl/	n phr	lối sống ít vận động
long-term health benefits	/lɒŋ tɜːm hɛlθ ˈbɛnɪfɪts/	n phr	lợi ích sức khỏe lâu dài
preventable diseases	/prɪˈvɛntəbəl dɪˈziːzɪz/	n phr	các bệnh có thể phòng tránh
comprehensive approach	/ˌkɒmprɪˈhɛnsɪv əˈprəʊtʃ/	n phr	cách tiếp cận toàn diện
nutritional awareness	/njuːˈtrɪʃənl əˈweənəs/	n phr	nhận thức về dinh dưỡng
physical activity engagement	/ˈfɪzɪkəl ækˈtɪvəti ɪnˈɡeɪdʒmənt/	n phr	sự tham gia vào hoạt động thể chất
health-conscious population	/hɛlθ ˈkɒnʃəs ˌpɒpjʊˈleɪʃən/	n phr	dân số có ý thức về sức khỏe

Sample 2

Chủ đề Law and Government: Some people believe that individuals who commit serious crimes should face the death penalty. Others argue that it is not humane to take a person’s life, no matter what the crime is. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

* Outline 

Introduction	Introduce the debate on the death penalty and state my opinion (partially agree—it can deter crime, but alternatives should be considered). Giới thiệu tranh luận về án tử hình và nêu quan điểm (đồng ý một phần—nó có thể răn đe tội phạm nhưng cần cân nhắc giải pháp thay thế).
Body 1	Arguments in favor: deterrent effect, justice for victims, prevents reoffending. Lập luận ủng hộ: có tác dụng răn đe, mang lại công lý cho nạn nhân, ngăn chặn tái phạm.
Body 2	Arguments against: moral concerns, risk of wrongful convictions, alternative punishments like life imprisonment. Lập luận phản đối: lo ngại về đạo đức, nguy cơ kết án oan, hình phạt thay thế như tù chung thân.
Conclusion	While the death penalty has its advantages, life imprisonment is a more humane and just alternative. Mặc dù án tử hình có một số lợi ích, nhưng tù chung thân là một lựa chọn nhân đạo và công bằng hơn.

* Sample Essay

The death penalty has long been a controversial issue, with strong arguments on both sides. From my own perspective, while capital punishment may serve as a deterrent to crime and ensure justice, it also raises serious ethical and judicial concerns. A more humane alternative, such as life imprisonment, should be considered in most cases.
Supporters of the death penalty argue that it acts as a powerful deterrent against serious crimes. The fear of execution may discourage potential offenders from committing violent crimes such as murder or terrorism. In my opinion, another key justification is that it provides justice for victims and their families. Many believe that capital punishment ensures that those who commit heinous acts receive the punishment they deserve. Additionally, executing dangerous criminals prevents them from reoffending, eliminating the risk of further harm to society.

However, opponents argue that the death penalty is fundamentally inhumane and morally unacceptable. Taking a person's life, regardless of their crimes, contradicts the principles of human rights and justice. From my own point of view, a major concern is the possibility of wrongful convictions. Numerous cases have shown that innocent individuals have been executed due to errors in the legal system. Furthermore, life imprisonment without parole is a more ethical and equally effective alternative, as it permanently removes criminals from society while avoiding the moral dilemma of state-sanctioned executions.

In conclusion, while the death penalty may provide deterrence and justice, its irreversible nature and ethical concerns make it a problematic punishment. Life imprisonment is a more humane and effective solution that upholds justice while eliminating the risk of wrongful executions.

Án tử hình từ lâu đã là một vấn đề gây tranh cãi, với những lập luận mạnh mẽ từ cả hai phía. Theo quan điểm của tôi, mặc dù hình phạt tử hình có thể đóng vai trò răn đe tội phạm và đảm bảo công lý, nhưng nó cũng đặt ra những lo ngại nghiêm trọng về đạo đức và tư pháp. Một giải pháp nhân đạo hơn, chẳng hạn như tù chung thân, nên được xem xét trong hầu hết các trường hợp.

Những người ủng hộ án tử hình cho rằng nó có tác dụng ngăn chặn tội phạm nghiêm trọng. Nỗi sợ bị xử tử có thể khiến tội phạm tiềm năng không dám thực hiện những hành vi bạo lực như giết người hoặc khủng bố. Theo ý kiến của tôi, một lý do quan trọng khác là nó mang lại công lý cho nạn nhân và gia đình của họ. Nhiều người tin rằng tử hình đảm bảo những kẻ phạm tội nghiêm trọng phải chịu hình phạt thích đáng. Ngoài ra, việc hành quyết những tội phạm nguy hiểm cũng giúp ngăn chặn họ tái phạm, loại bỏ nguy cơ gây hại thêm cho xã hội.

Tuy nhiên, những người phản đối lập luận rằng án tử hình về bản chất là vô nhân đạo và không thể chấp nhận về mặt đạo đức. Việc tước đoạt mạng sống của một người, dù họ phạm tội gì, đi ngược lại các nguyên tắc về nhân quyền và công lý. Từ góc nhìn của tôi, một mối lo ngại lớn là nguy cơ kết án oan. Đã có nhiều trường hợp cho thấy những người vô tội bị hành quyết do sai sót trong hệ thống pháp luật. Hơn nữa, tù chung thân không ân xá là một lựa chọn đạo đức hơn và cũng hiệu quả không kém, vì nó loại bỏ vĩnh viễn tội phạm khỏi xã hội mà không gây ra tranh cãi về mặt đạo đức liên quan đến việc tử hình.

Tóm lại, mặc dù án tử hình có thể răn đe và mang lại công lý, nhưng tính chất không thể đảo ngược và các vấn đề đạo đức của nó khiến nó trở thành một hình phạt gây tranh cãi. Tù chung thân là một giải pháp nhân đạo và hiệu quả hơn, đảm bảo công lý mà không gây rủi ro kết án oan.

* Uncommon Words & Collocations

capital punishment	/ˈkæpɪtəl ˈpʌnɪʃmənt/	n phr	hình phạt tử hình
deterrent effect	/dɪˈtɜːrənt ɪˈfɛkt/	n phr	tác dụng răn đe
heinous crimes	/ˈheɪnəs kraɪmz/	n phr	tội ác tàn bạo
wrongful convictions	/ˈrɒŋfʊl kənˈvɪkʃənz/	n phr	kết án oan
state-sanctioned executions	/steɪt ˈsæŋkʃənd ˌɛksɪˈkjuːʃənz/	n phr	hành quyết do nhà nước thực hiện

Sample 3

Chủ đề foods: In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food. Many people think that it is good to eat traditional foods while others believe that fast food is a good choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

* Outline 

Viewpointit is good to eat traditional foods vs. fast food is a good choice

Introduction	taking the place / popularity/ common of fast food opinion: agree with the latter view, which is traditional food
Body 1	compelling reasons why fast food is good: + convenient, time-saving -> take little time to prepare / many fast food chains, restaurants in megacities. + delicious taste/flavor -> KFC, McDonald, franchise -> suitable for people of all ages, especially the young
Body 2	Why I believe that traditional food is good + main advantage: nutritious -> good for people’s health -> fresh ingredients, homemade meal, no preservatives -> maintain good health + cultural preservation - preserve culture -> unique flavor of traditional food -> contribute to the culture of a nation -> reflection of national cuisine -> pass down to the next generation.
Conclusion	repeat and emphasize the opinion

* Sample essay

In different parts of the world, traditional foods are becoming less common due to the increasing popularity of international fast food. While some people believe that fast food is a good option, I think that consuming traditional foods is much more beneficial. This essay will demonstrate the author’s point of view.

On the one hand, there are compelling reasons why many people are in favor of fast food. Firstly, it is convenient and time-saving. Instead of having to prepare a meal for hours, people can easily grab a bite at any fast food restaurant, which is ubiquitous in many megacities. This type of food is also suitable for those with fast-paced lifestyles. In addition, fast food is famous for its delicious taste. This can explain the successful franchises of various fast food chains all over the world such as McDonald’s, KFC, and so on.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that eating traditional food is more advantageous. One of the most substantial benefits of traditional meals is the nutritional value that they contain. A homemade meal can provide a sufficient amount of protein, fiber, and many other nutrients, which has proved to be effective in maintaining  good health. This is because traditional food is usually made from fresh ingredients and without any preservatives. More importantly, I would argue that consuming traditional food rather than fast food is a good way to preserve culture as each flavor has its own uniqueness and is a representation of the national cuisine. By making and eating traditional food, people are contributing to cultural preservation, and thus passing it down to the next generation.

In conclusion, even though fast food consumption has been an accelerating trend in recent years due to its conveniences, I sincerely believe that the benefits of eating traditional food are more significant.

Words: 302

* Vocabulary and Collocations

to be in favor of sth	/tuː biː ɪn ˈfeɪvər ɒv ˈsʌmθɪŋ/	v phr	đồng tình với cái gì
ubiquitous	/juːˈbɪkwɪtəs/	adj	rất nhiều, có thể nhìn thấy ở khắp mọi nơi
fast-paced lifestyles	/fɑːst peɪst ˈlaɪfstaɪlz/	n phr	sống nhanh, bận rộn, vội vàng
franchise	/ˈfrænʧaɪz/	n	nhượng quyền
an accelerating trend	/ən ækˈsɛləreɪtɪŋ trɛnd/	n phr	xu hướng thịnh hành (đang tăng tốc)
cultural preservation	/ˈkʌlʧərəl ˌprɛzɑːˈveɪʃən/	n phr	bảo tồn văn hóa
nutritional value	/njuːˈtrɪʃənl ˈvæljuː/	n phr	giá trị dinh dưỡng

Sample 4

Chủ đề Education: Some people think that in order to continuously improve the quality of education, high school students should be encouraged to criticise their teachers. Others think that would result in a loss of principle in class. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 words.

* Outline

PARAGRAPHS	MISSION	IN-DEPTH	HELPERS (tìm 1 số từ vựng để lát đưa vào bài)
INTRODUCTION	+ Re-introduce the viewpoints + Answer the questions	+ Paraphrase 2 viewpoints (show off grammar, vocabulary) + Prefers vp1, will defend vp1	continue (v) educate (v) educational (a) encouragement (n) criticism (n) lose (v) classes (n)
BODY 1	+ Defend the disliked point (P2, dig deep on why some think this way)	+ Students allowed to criticize → start to look down on teacher → not obedient → lose classroom hierarchy / affects class, relationship + Students might abuse criticism for personal attack, delay the flow of class	criticise, lecturer, teacher, look down on sb, not obedient, stubborn.   - Class loses structure. - Teacher loses their integrity, loses face. - Affect relationship between teachers and learners.   - Students actively abuse criticism for personal attack, delaying the flow of the lesson.
BODY 2	+Defend preferred point (P1, dig deep)	+However, if students can point out mistakes → contribute to the lesson → remember the lesson better → increase the quality of the class    + Students have rights to express their thoughts → more confident, expressive, brave, stand against misinformation → build healthy character   Note: If teacher is knowledgeable, there should be no issues with students commenting.	However, if students are allowed to give criticism, both learn, both build, establish a healthy and positive atmosphere for the class. Students remember the lesson thoroughly → successful lesson.    + build self-esteem, confidence, confident, brave enough to defend the truths, stand up against false information →  build good personality.    If teacher has experience in teaching, having students criticizing their work during classes is useful for the process of learning
CONCLUSION	+ Conclude and emphasize on why point 1 is better	Việc cho học sinh phê bình có thể dẫn đến xích mích, trì trệ trong lớp, nhưng hoàn toàn có thể ngăn chặn nếu giáo viên có trình độ. Việc cho học sinh phê bình giáo viên thì sẽ rất có lợi cho cả lớp học, người học lẫn người dạy đều học hỏi được từ nhau.	- Lecturers and teachers receiving criticism might cause conflict   - Might delay the class but preventable.   - However, students should be permitted to criticize because they learn from each other…

* Sample Essay

It is believed by many people that educators such as teachers and lecturers should receive lesson-related criticism from their learners and that encouragement towards these students and pupils should be given. Some, in contrast, believe that this phenomenon might potentially create a toxic atmosphere in the classroom by dismantling the standard rules, manners and principles. In my view, allowing students to stand up for the truths and facts surely outweighs the feelings of the educators and the classrooms’ rules. In this essay, I will elaborate both viewpoints and defend my stance. 

First, it is understandable for people to think that letting students criticise their teachers might be a bad move in the classroom. When students start to point out flaws of the teachers more frequently, though everyone makes mistakes, the respect for mentioned educators is lowered, subconsciously. This can be detrimental to the hierarchy of the classroom and can hurt the feelings of the educators. In other words, criticism from students potentially affects the relationship between them and their teachers. Worse, constant criticism consumes time, thus further delays the flow of the lesson at hand. The teachers will not be able to do their job on time, and the students will lose information that they are supposed to receive during the sitting. 

However, there are good things in giving students permission to give criticism to their knowledgeable information-sharers. It, firstly, helps build the lesson. By being allowed to have a say in the class, they are directly contributing to the shared knowledge, and thus expanding knowledge borders for both themselves and the teacher. With this interactive method of teaching, the students will remember the information more deeply. It, therefore, increases the quality of the lesson, and it is the ultimate goal of a successful class. Further, when a student stands up for what they believe is true, it creates a healthy mindset for said student. They are now braver, more confident, and they dare to express themselves, intellectually. This is incredible for building character for this younger generation, as it teaches them self-esteem and the ability to defend their rights. If the teacher is knowledgeable enough and is willing to learn, they would have no problem in letting their students interrupt their lesson from time to time to point out a mistake they made. Personally, I think it is what a good teacher should do. 

To conclude, it is understandable that some people fear giving students the ability to point out academic mistakes during lessons, as it can disrupt the lesson itself and damage the image of the educator. But ultimately, students should be encouraged to give criticism to contribute to the lesson and build their character in the process. 

* Vocabulary and Collocations

dismantle	/dɪsˈmæntl/	v	triệt phá, hủy bỏ, phá vỡ (hệ thống, quy tắc)
detrimental	/ˌdɛtrɪˈmɛntl/	adj	có hại, gây bất lợi
hierarchy	/ˈhaɪərɑːki/	n	hệ thống cấp bậc, tôn ti trật tự
subconsciously	/ˌsʌbˈkɒnʃəsli/	adv	một cách vô thức, trong tiềm thức
constant	/ˈkɒnstənt/	adj	liên tục, không ngừng nghỉ
ultimate	/ˈʌltɪmət/	adj	cuối cùng, cốt lõi, tối thượng
intellectually	/ˌɪntəˈlɛkʧʊəli/	adv	về mặt trí tuệ, một cách có tri thức
self-esteem	/sɛlf ɪsˈtiːm/	n	lòng tự trọng, sự tự tôn
elaborate	/ɪˈlæbərɪt/	v	giải thích chi tiết, làm rõ
disrupt	/dɪsˈrʌpt/	v	gây gián đoạn, làm gián đoạn

Sample 5

Chủ đề Education: Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

* Outline

Introduction	Re-introduce the viewpoints Answer the questions
Body 1	Body 1: Quan điểm 1: students make comments or even criticism on teachers có thể improve educational quality như thế nào? Ngày nay, education = service, students = customers, teachers = service provider => customers make complaints, providers make rectification Cụ thể, các giáo viên sẽ phải cẩn thận hơn về lesson planning và communication trong lớp => deliver the best lessons
Body 2	Quan điểm 2: students make comments or even criticism on teachers có thể gây ra loss of respect and discipline in the classroom như thế nào? Direct argument between teachers and students in the classroom => lose temper, waste time of other 40 students when teachers have to spend time arguing with 1 or 2
Conclusion	cần phải thực hiện việc này thật cẩn thận, thông qua indirect feedback như là notes, letters, message boxes, hoặc là private direct conversation.

* Sample essay

There are conflicting opinions on whether high school students should be allowed to comment or criticize their teachers. From my perspective, although this proposal theoretically can enhance educational quality, its practice must be carefully executed so as to maintain order and the collective benefit of all students in the classroom.

One the one hand, it is completely reasonable that feedback from students can improve teaching quality. In this day and age, education is gradually becoming a service, while leaners and teachers are also customers and service providers respectively. As a consequence, it is completely natural for customers to make complaints when they are not satisfied with the service they receive. This process undoubtedly improves the quality of the service as the providers can make rectification. In particular, teachers will need to be more careful with lesson planning and in-class communication in order to bring their students the best lessons.

On the other hand, improper execution of the aforementioned theory can cause some detrimental impacts. First, in the process of giving and receiving negative feedback, direct arguments between teachers and students in the classroom are unavoidable, which easily lead to disorder and cause the individuals involved to lose their temper, and inappropriate words can be spoken. Moreover, in case the teacher has to waste time answering the questions of a couple of unsatisfied students when the other 40 are completely satisfied, the overall benefit of the entire class will be adversely affected.

The arguments presented above lead to a conclusion that the key to success of this proposal lies in careful implementation. In order to avoid direct conflict in the process of exchanging feedback, indirect means of communication including message boxes, notes, and letters should be utilized. Unsatisfied students can also have a private direct conversation with their teachers in order to have a detailed discussion. These approaches will ensure that unsatisfied students’ opinions are heard while the valuable in-class time of other students are not wasted.

(326 words, band 7.0)

* Vocabulary highlights      

approach	/əˈprəʊʧ/	n	cách tiếp cận, cách thực hiện
argument	/ˈɑːɡjʊmənt/	n	cuộc tranh luận
collective / overall	/kəˈlɛktɪv/ / /ˈəʊvərɔːl/	adj	thuộc về tập thể, chung
complaint	/kəmˈpleɪnt/	n	sự chê bai, phàn nàn
disorder	/dɪsˈɔːdə/	n	sự hỗn loạn, mất trật tự
exchange	/ɪksˈʧeɪnʤ/	v	trao đổi qua lại
execute / implement	/ˈɛksɪkjuːt/ / /ˈɪmplɪmɛnt/	v	tiến hành, triển khai
execution / implementation / practice	/ˌɛksɪˈkjuːʃən/ / /ˌɪmplɪmɛnˈteɪʃən/ / /ˈpræktɪs/	n	sự tiến hành, triển khai một việc nào nó trên thực tế
feedback	/ˈfiːdbæk/	n	phản hồi
inappropriate / improper	/ˌɪnæˈprəʊprɪɪt/ / /ɪmˈprɒpə/	adj	không phù hợp
lesson plan	/ˈlɛsn plæn/	n	giáo án
lesson planning	/ˈlɛsn ˈplænɪŋ/	n	việc soạn giáo án
lose temper	/luːz ˈtɛmpə/	v	nổi nóng
rectify / rectification	/ˈrɛktɪfaɪ/ / /ˌrɛktɪfɪˈkeɪʃən/	v / n	sửa chữa / sự sửa chữa
satisfied >< unsatisfied	/ˈsætɪsfaɪd/ >< /ʌnˈsætɪsfaɪd/	adj	thỏa mãn >< không thỏa mãn
utilize / use	/ˈjuːtɪlaɪz/ / /juːz/	v	sử dụng

Đây là một bài viết với từ vựng và các main ideas đều rất đơn giản để tất cả các bạn học sinh đều có thể tiếp thu và làm theo được. Thử sức nha.

Sample 6

Chủ đề Sport: Some people think that hosting international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

* Outline

Introduction	Re-introduce the viewpoints Answer the questions
Body 1	Body 1: thừa nhận ý kiến 2 Disadvantages: - Finance: build expensive new venues for sports/infrastructure and facilities - the costs can exceed millions of dollars - High risk of spreading contagious disease (Covid – 19): influx international travelers => large crowds of spectators => ideal for the spread of the virus Tuy nhiên: - High vaccination coverage rate (tỉ lệ che phủ vaccine cao) and herd community (miễn dịch cộng đồng) => safe
Body 2	Body 2: ý kiến của người viết đồng ý với Advantages: - Investment and profits: Receive substantial revenue from ticket sales, tourist spending, and television rights => make a large profit - Popularize the image of the host: friendly people, good environment => increase international cooperation, especially in commerce and tourism
Conclusion	tổng kết

* Sample Essay

Recently, there are contrasting viewpoints regarding the pros and cons of organizing sports events with the participation of teams from different countries. In my opinion, despite some drawbacks including construction costs and the risk of spreading diseases, the benefits of these events, namely opportunities for the host to make profits and popularize their image, are much more convincing.

For once, it is completely reasonable for some people to believe that hosting international sport tournaments is disadvantageous. This is because the cost required to construct the infrastructure and facilities for such events can reach millions of dollars, which might be unaffordable for some developing countries. Moreover, the spread of contagious diseases, such as the COVID-19, is another plausible reason. During these events, the influx international travelers and large crowds of spectators inside the stadium or gymnasium create ideal conditions for the spread of the virus. However, I firmly believe that with the increasing vaccination coverage rates and herd community witnessed in many countries nowadays and in the future, it is rather safe to welcome foreign sports fans.

In contrast, from a personal perspective, the opposite viewpoint is much more agreeable due to the advantages of international sports tournaments. First, they provide the host countries with opportunities to receive great amounts of revenue from ticket sales, tourist spending, and television rights. In other words, this is only the problem of investment and return, and if properly managed, these events are wonderful chances to enrich the national budget. Furthermore, the image of the host with friendly people and good environment can be popularized, which results in an increase in international cooperation, especially in commerce and tourism. This had been proven by the success of the 2003 SEA Games in Vietnam.

In conclusion, despite the existence of some finance and safety concerns, I hold a strong belief that sports events are golden opportunities for economic growth, and they can be successfully organized with careful planning and precautions.

(323 words, band 7.5)

* Vocabulary highlights      

pros	/prəʊnz/	n	ưu điểm, lợi ích
cons	/ɒnz/	n	nhược điểm, tác hại
popularize	/ˈpɒpjʊləraɪz/	v	quảng bá, làm cho phổ biến
infrastructure	/ˈɪnfrəˌstrʌkʧə/	n	cơ sở hạ tầng
contagious	/kənˈteɪʤəs/	adj	truyền nhiễm, lây nhiễm
influx	/ˈɪnflʌks/	n	sự tràn vào, dòng (người, tiền bạc) đổ vào
perspective	/pəˈspɛktɪv/	n	góc nhìn, quan điểm
revenue	/ˈrɛvɪnjuː/	n	doanh thu
commerce	/ˈkɒmɜːs/	n	thương mại, sự buôn bán
precaution	/prɪˈkɔːʃən/	n	biện pháp phòng ngừa, sự đề phòng

Sample 7

Chủ đề Charity: Some people say charities should help to people who are in the greatest need no matter where they live, while some others say they should focus on people in their country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

* Outline

Introduction	Re-introduce the viewpoints Answer the questions
Body 1	Body 1: Reasons to help people in their own country: - Human nature: Donators can be persuaded easily to send help to people living in the same community, geographic regions, ethnic groups, and nation => Sense of belonging (n): cảm giác thuộc về một tập thể, cộng đồng - Nationalism (n): chủ nghĩa dân tộc / national unity (n): sự đoàn kết dân tộc: when people of the same country support each other for the collective benefit of the country Example: Vietnam, storms and flooding in the central provinces => individuals and organizations from the North and the South immediately send help
Body 2	Body 2: Reasons to help the most miserable people regardless of their places of living - The original and fundamental meaning of charity: support individuals in times of peril => geographic, national, and territorial differences should not become barriers - The ability of international charitable organizations, for instance The Red Cross: Have branches and offices worldwide => timely reach and support people in any country.
Conclusion	tổng kết

* Sample Essay

Recently there are different views on whether charitable organisations should send material and financial aid to the most miserable individuals regardless of their places of living, or should they concentrate on helping people from their own country. From a personal perspective, despite some obvious reasons for the latter idea, it seems that the former one is much more agreeable due to the core principle of charity and the operational ability of international organizations.

On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe prefer giving support to their own countrymen. It is much easier for donators to be persuaded to send help to people sharing some similarities, such as those belonging to the same community, geographic region, or ethnic group. This creates a sense of belonging in all members of such communities or groups. Moreover, nationalism has always been a mainstream ideology in many countries. When people of a country give assistance to each other for the collective benefit of the nation, national unity is achieved. Vietnam can be a great example; when natural disasters such as storms or flooding happened in the central region last year, individuals and organizations from the north and the south immediately joined hand and sent their support.

On the other hand, from my viewpoint, the poorest members of society should be the first ones to receive assistance regardless of where they live. The most original and fundamental meaning of philanthropy is to provide sufficient support to individuals in times of peril. There are countless examples from victims of war in the Middle East to African inhabitants who suffer from hunger. These people surely deserve to receive support, and geographical, national, and territorial differences should not become barriers. Another important point is that international philanthropic organisations, The Red Cross for instance, have established branches and offices globally. This enables them to operate worldwide and timely reach poverty-stricken individuals who are in desperate need of their help.

In conclusion, based on the aforementioned arguments, the poorest should always be prioritised despite their living locations.

(339 words, band 7.0)

Some final thoughts:

Nhìn chung thì bài thi trên máy tính cực kỳ ưu việt ở kỹ năng Reading và Writing. Trong quá trình viết thầy đã chỉnh sửa bằng Cut/Copy/Paste rất nhiều. Đó là lí do tại sao thầy lại có thể viết được dài hơn hẳn (339 words) so với bình thường hay dạy học sinh trên lớp (dưới 300 words). Lúc về nhà viết lại thì thầy mới phát hiện ra một số lỗi chính tả mà mình đã không để ý trong lúc thi, ví dụ như các từ philanthropy, poverty, và flooding. Có lẽ vì những lỗi này mà bài viết đạt 7.0 mà không được 7.5 như kỳ vọng.

Còn với phần Reading, trên máy tính, thí sinh có thể highlight các từ vựng/câu văn quan trọng chứa thông tin một cách dễ dàng. Việc dung bàn phím và chuột để lướt qua bài đọc cũng nhanh và thuận tiện hơn hẳn so với lật từng trang giấy và dò tìm từ khóa bằng bút chì.

Vocabulary

charitable organisation / philanthropic organisation	/ˈʧærɪtəbl ˌɔːɡənaɪˈzeɪʃən/ / /ˌfɪlənˈθrɒpɪk ˌɔːɡənaɪˈzeɪʃən/	n phr	tổ chức từ thiện
charity / philanthropy	/ˈʧærɪti/ / /fɪˈlænθrəpi/	n	việc từ thiện nói chung
community	/kəˈmjuːnɪti/	n	cộng đồng
countrymen	/ˈkʌntrɪmən/	n	những người đồng hương
donator	/dəʊˈneɪtə/	n	người quyên góp, tài trợ tiền/ vật chất cho người nghèo
ethnic group	/ˈɛθnɪk ɡruːp/	n	dân tộc
geographic region	/ˌʤɪəˈɡræfɪk ˈriːʤən/	n phr	vùng miền
in times of peril	/ɪn taɪmz ɒv ˈpɛrɪl/	n phr	trong những lúc nguy hiểm, hoạn nạn
mainstream ideology	/ˈmeɪnstriːm ˌaɪdɪˈɒləʤi/	n phr	hệ tư tưởng chính thống
support / help / assist / assistance / aid	/səˈpɔːt/ / /hɛlp/ / /əˈsɪst/ / /əˈsɪstəns/ / /eɪd/	v / n	giúp đỡ, trợ giúp, cứu trợ
the poorest members of society	/ðə ˈpʊərɪst ˈmɛmbəz ɒv səˈsaɪəti/ / /ðə ˈpʊərɪst/ / /ðə məʊst ˈmɪzərəbl ˌɪndɪˈvɪdjʊəlz/ / /ˈpɒvəti-ˈstrɪkən ˌɪndɪˈvɪdjʊəlz/	n phr	những người nghèo khổ nhất
where they live	/weə ðeɪ lɪv/ / /ðeə ˈlɪvɪŋ ləʊˈkeɪʃənz/ / /ðeə pleɪs ɒv ˈlɪvɪŋ/	clause / n phr	nơi họ (những người nghèo khổ cần giúp đỡ) sinh sống

Sample 8

Chủ đề Architectural style: Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style.

* Outline

Introduction	[TOPIC] has become a perpetual concern/contentious topic. Some individuals believe that [VIEWPOINT 1], while others claim that [VIEWPOINT 2]. In this essay, I would like to discuss both of these perspectives before drawing a reasoned conclusion.
Body 1	infringement on personal liberty SUPPORT: personal freedom the cornerstone of constitutionalized states → only require to follow if built within strictly regulated heritage sites
Body 2	Follow the style of old buildings (1) economic values from tourism activities (2) educational values to future generations
Conclusion	GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION

* Sample Essay

The architectural style has become a perpetual concern for the public in recent years. Some individuals believe that newly built houses should follow the same style as old buildings, while others argue that citizens should have the freedom to choose the architectural style for their homes. In this essay, I would like to discuss both of these perspectives before drawing a reasoned conclusion.

On the one hand, the implementation of style restriction on new construction could be considered a direct attack on personal liberty. Immediate personal freedom in areas of civic life has always been a cornerstone of any constitutionalized society, which means some forms of restrictions on how citizens could build their homes could contravene their fundamental right, the right to an adequate standard of living, or the right to live comfortably. In other words, the government should encourage citizens to follow some sets off rules and restrictions only if new-build projects occur within strictly regulated heritage zones.

On the other hand, requiring newly constructed homes to follow earlier era-built houses might bring economic values from tourism activities and historical and cultural values for future generations. Firstly, new constructions inside heritage zones and archaeological reservations should be subject to heritage preservation legislation, including height and style restrictions, due to the need to preserve the overall picture of these areas to draw an influx of domestic and international tourists. Letting residents build their houses based on their preferences might eventually disturb the landscape panorama and its immediate surroundings, later potentially losing its allure to travelers and holiday-makers. Secondly, from a heritage point of view, a composed landscape with architectually valuable or historically significant buildings or a landscape bearing signs of centuries of a well-established type of farming or other uses might provide the locals and future generations with testimony to the past. Any disturbance from the facade of newly built houses could destroy the attempt by the administation to preserve the educational values to teach future generations about cultural and historical values of ancient towns and heritage sites.

In conclusion, despite certain validity in favor of letting citizens have the right to choose the architectural style for their houses, I believe that these new constructions should adhere to the style of old buildings for economic and educational benefits.

Words: 378.

* Vocabulary and Collocations:

a direct attack on	/ə dɪˈrɛkt əˈtæk ɒn/	n phr	một cuộc tấn công trực tiếp lên
contrawene	/ˌkɒntrəˈviːn/	v	can thiệp, trái ngược
fundamental right	/ˌfʌndəˈmɛntl raɪt/	n phr	quyền cơ bản
the right to an adequate standard of living	/ðə raɪt tuː ən ˈædɪkwɪt ˈstændəd ɒv ˈlɪvɪŋ/	n phr	quyền có cuộc sống cơ bản
the right to live comfortably	/ðə raɪt tuː lɪv ˈkʌmftəbli/	n phr	quyền được sống thoải mái
heritage zones	/ˈhɛrɪtɪʤ zəʊnz/	n phr	khu vực di sản
architectually valuable and historically significant buildings	/ˌɑːkɪˈtɛkʧʊəli ˈvæljʊəbl ænd hɪsˈtɒrɪkəli sɪɡˈnɪfɪkənt ˈbɪldɪŋz/	n phr	tòa nhà có giá trị về lịch sử và kiến trúc
archaeological reservations	/ˌɑːkɪəˈlɒʤɪkəl ˌrɛzəˈveɪʃənz/	n phr	bảo tồn khảo cổ học
heritage preservation legislation	/ˈhɛrɪtɪʤ ˌprɛzɑːˈveɪʃən ˌlɛʤɪsˈleɪʃən/	n phr	luật bảo tồn di sản
draw an influx of	/drɔː ən ˈɪnflʌks ɒv/	v phr	thu hút một lượng lớn...
lose allure to	/luːz əˈlʊə tuː/	v phr	mất đi sức hấp dẫn với...
provide sb with testimony to	/prəˈvaɪd ˈsʌmbədi wɪð ˈtɛstɪməni tuː/	v phr	cung cấp bằng chứng về...
panorama	/ˌpænəˈrɑːmə/	n	toàn cảnh
facade	/fəˈsɑːd/	n	mặt tiền

Sample 9

Chủ đề Gender Equality: Some people are of the opinion that women should play an equal role in police or military forces like the army. Others believe that this work is unsuitable for women. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

* Outline

Introduction	[Topic] has become a controversial/debatable topic. Some individuals argue that [Viewpoint 1], while others believe that [Viewpoint 2]. In this essay, I would discuss both of these perspectives before drawing my own conclusion.
Body 1	Viewpoint 1: Discrepancy in physio capacity between men and women Concerns about the integrity and effectiveness of military and police readiness.
Body 2	Viewpoint 2: Shattering the ceiling glass of gender equality Potentials to improve police-community relations
Conclusion	tổng kết

* Sample Essay

Gender equality in military service and law enforcement has become a controversial topic. Some individuals believe that women are not well-adapted to those professions, while others argue that gender equality should be ensured in those fields. In this essay, I would discuss both of these perspectives before drawing my reasoned conclusion.

On the one hand, those opposed to the idea of women joining police ranks and serving in the military might believe in inherent disparities relating to physio capacity and potential distractions caused by men-versus-men competition for women’s attention. Firstly, due to biological characteristics, women might be less likely to meet the physical standards than their male counterparts. The campaigning of gender equity in military forces might become a mere tokenism, adversely impacting combat units’ effectiveness by lowering the standards just for equating the level of female and male presence. Secondly, men and women standing shoulder to shoulder might influence the military and police’s integrity and professionalism detrimentally. Those influenced by Darwinist aphorism might think that women could distract heterosexual male officers from their ever-essential role and duty, especially in combat or criminal arresting missions. Ever-growing sexual harassment accusations in various male-dominated areas might highlight a practical example of the potentials of complicated sexual relations and interactions between male and female officers, severely impacting their effectiveness of their duty, especially given that a state budget burden has been of significant concern for taxpayers.

On the other hand, there are several reasons the military and law enforcement should allow women participation. Firstly, if the military shifts its policy to recognize the long-forgotten role of women in combat, it will be swiftly translated as shattering the glass ceiling of the last front challenging generations of feminists and those fighting against gender discrimination. Allowing women to draft for the military, along with women elected as heads of states, would be a harbinger for the epoch of gender equality. Also, despite the disinclination to acknowledge women’s combat duty and rejection to open its door to these long-considered second-class citizens, women have been actively involved in several domestic and global conflicts. In other words, the full recognition of women’s status in the military would indicate that the government values contribution by its citizens equally and justly, ultimately enabling women to be successful in this traditionally male-hegemonistic field. Secondly, women could bring fundamental changes to the policing culture, which is recently under strict scrutiny and criticism. Women with skillful communication could help diffuse contentious situations because they are less likely to use excessive force. Given the heightened growing tensions between sheriff’s departments and communities they serve, women could improve police-community relations as they tend to rely less on physical force or weapons and more on effective communication.

In conclusion, despite some valid arguments of opposing women joining military and law enforcement relating to the sex-borne innate biological differences and the harmful impact of male competition for female attention, I am more convinced that gender equality should be prioritized due to the idea of reaching gender justice and women’s capacity as effective communicators to improve police-community connections.

Words: 510.

* Vocabulary and Collocations:

equality	/ɪˈkwɒlɪti/	n	sự bình đẳng
inherent	/ɪnˈhɪərənt/	adj	vốn có, cố hữu
disparity	/dɪˈspærɪti/	n	sự chênh lệch, sự khác biệt
adversely	/ˈædvɜːsli/	adv	một cách bất lợi, tiêu cực
harassment	/ˈhærəsmənt/	n	sự quấy rối
shatter	/ˈʃætə/	v	đập tan, làm tiêu tan
harbinger	/ˈhɑːbɪnʤə/	n	điềm báo, dấu hiệu báo trước
scrutiny	/ˈskruːtɪni/	n	sự kiểm tra kỹ lưỡng, sự xem xét cẩn trọng
diffuse	/dɪˈfjuːz/	v	làm dịu đi, làm bớt căng thẳng
contentious	/kənˈtɛnʃəs/	adj	dễ gây tranh cãi, hay gây xung đột

Sample 10

Chủ đề How to define success: Some people say that individuals who make a lot of money are most successful. Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are most successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

* Outline

Introduction	[TOPIC] has become a controversial topic. Some individuals claim that [Viewpoint 1], whereas others argue that [Viewpoint 2]. Both of these viewpoints would be discussed in this essay before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Body 1	Financial success (a) no universal definition of success/individuals vary in their definitions of success → challenging to compare people’s success across the board → need a convenient and clear tool → money (depending on tax payments, financial reports, estimated assets) offers a transparent tool to know exactly who is more successful (Forbes’ Billionaire List released annually). (b) Influence of capitalism and consumerism → judge people based on their property and money → more money more successful. COUNTER-ARGUMENT: no guarantee over the sources of money, especially in countries with widespread corruption and bribery → if depend on money to define success, directly encourage people to make money at any cost without any ethical worries (use their money to influence those in power to pass policy that ultimately benefits to their business: policy corruption).
Body 2	Socially beneficial success difficult to exactly quantify the extent of influence by many professions → need a long period of time to understand clearly the scope of social impacts by scientists, teachers, by IT engineers → scientists: develop Sars-CoV-2 vaccines to save millions of lives and bring the world back to normal; teachers: help to educate future generations → need 20, 30 years to evaluate their contribution; IT engineers: create breakthrough technology to change/improve living standards; politicians: policy making has influence over millions of people → those people making significantly less money compared to businessmen and women → depending on social contribution would be fairer and more just for various professionals.
Conclusion	tổng kết

* Sample Essay

How to define success has become a controversial topic nowadays. Some individuals argue that those financially wealthy should be considered the most successful, whereas others claim that those contributing most to society are the most successful. Both of these viewpoints would be discussed in this essay before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.

On the one hand, various reasons are explaining why money is regarded as the standard of success. Firstly, individuals hold different viewpoints of the definition of success, which requires us to have a straightforward and convenient tool for comparing people's success across the board. Money and property could be a transparent and obvious measure to know exactly how successful people are, depending on their financial reports and tax payments. For example, Forbes magazine annually releases a list of global billionaires for readers to know who is wealthiest or most successful during a particular year. Secondly, with the influence of consumerism and capitalism, people start to judge one another by how much money they earn. In other words, more money is equal to more success. However, these reasons ignore the potential sources of money, in which those in failed states with widespread corruption and bribery could easily exploit their wealth and network to influence those in power to favor their business or change policy to benefit their money-making. In other words, using money as the definition of success would ultimately encourage people to make a fortune at any cost without any ethical worries.

On the other hand, I firmly believe that those most successful should be those contributing the most to society. Through breakthrough inventions, policymaking, and education, the scope of social contribution poses a severe challenge for anyone to quantify precisely how much influence those people have made. For example, the economic contribution made by scientists involved in the process of Sars-CoV-2 vaccine development helping to save millions of lives and bring the world back to normal, is difficult to be evaluated. In other similar cases, teachers helping to educate future generations usually earn significantly less money than businessmen and businesswomen. If money is the only definition of success, it would be unjust for those engaged in other professions with a lower salary but an enormous influence on society. In other words, defining success by social contribution would encourage people to partake in socially beneficial activities and professions.

In conclusion, while money is to some extent showing an individual's success, the social contribution should be regarded as the ultimate definition of success.

Words: 414.

* Vocabulary and Collocations:

controversial	/ˌkɒntrəˈvɜːʃəl/	adj	gây tranh cãi
transparent	/trænsˈpærənt/	adj	minh bạch, rõ ràng
exploit	/ɪkˈsplɔɪt/	v	khai thác, bóc lột, lợi dụng
ethical	/ˈɛθɪkəl/	adj	thuộc về đạo đức, hợp đạo đức
fortune	/ˈfɔːʧən/	n	sự giàu có, gia tài, vận may
breakthrough	/ˈbreɪkθruː/	n	bước đột phá
quantify	/ˈkwɒntɪfaɪ/	v	định lượng, đo lường
evaluate	/ɪˈvæljʊeɪt/	v	đánh giá, định giá
enormous	/ɪˈnɔːməs/	adj	to lớn, khổng lồ
partake	/pɑːˈteɪk/	v	tham gia, tham dự

Trên đây là một số bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 dạng bài Discussion, các bạn tham khảo nha.

Xem thêm bài mẫu:

IELTS Writing Task 2 - Topic: Sports (kèm video hướng dẫn)